Scientists Use Brain Stimulation to ‘Make You Stop Believing in God’

In October, 2015 the Daily Express reported that scientists have been successful in manipulating people’s thoughts and values using electromagnetic stimulation of the brain. In this article Melissa Dykes from TruthStreamMedia examines this issue, it’s history and the possible implications for human rights and freedom.

This article by Melissa Dykes was originally seen on TruthStreamMedia

The Daily Express is reporting today that scientists are using electromagnets to literally alter (and thus control) people’s thoughts and beliefs.

Before we start talking about how this technology isn’t new, here’s the gist:

A bizarre experiment claims to be able to make Christians no longer believe in God and make Britons open their arms to migrants in experiments some may find a threat to their values…

Using a technique called transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), researchers safely shut down certain groups of neurones in the brains of volunteers.

TMS, which is used to treat depression, involves placing a large electromagnetic coil against the scalp which creates electric currents that stimulate nerve cells in the region of the brain involved in mood control.

Researchers found the technique radically altered religious perceptions and prejudice… Belief in God was reduced almost by a third, while participants became 28.5 per cent less bothered by immigration numbers.

And that little glimpse is just the tip of the modern mind control technology iceberg.

One of the social engineers heading up this study is University of York’s Dr. Keise Izuma, a lecturer in the Psychology Department. His bio on the college’s website says, “My research interests lie in the area of social cognitive neuroscience and include social decision-making, pro-social behaviour, social influence, attitude change, and cognitive consistency (e.g., cognitive dissonance theory, balance theory).”

Just consider that for a moment… “social cognitive neuroscience” to include “pro-social behaviour”. The good doctor co-authored a paper in 2013 titled, “Social manipulation of preference in the human brain.” Now he’s using brain stimulation to change people’s beliefs in God or the immigrant crisis upsetting so many over in Europe… how very pro-Government of him.

The study was done in collaboration with UCLA’s Dr. Colin Holbrook, whose interests include “Threat-detection, Morality, Aggression, Group prejudice, Evolutionary psychology, Social neuroscience.” Dr. Holbrook, by the way, just received a $360,000 grant from the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory for work on “Group Bias and the Attribution of Mental Properties to Allies, Antagonists, and Automata.” Great.

Compare their experiment to a video from four years ago showing BBC reporter Michael Mosley having parts of his brain literally shut off with the same technology. Listen to the extensive list of things scientists can alter or inhibit using electromagnets.

With this technology, a person’s visual cortex can be switched off so he can’t see. The interference can be even more specific, rendering us unable to distinguish faces. They can stop someone from performing basic actions, such as moving limbs or digits. They can stop us from being able to compute numbers, from being able to count, or even from being able to speak.

“You think of something you can do and we’ve basically interfered with it with this machine,” the scientist in the video above says with a smile.

So, by extension, it isn’t surprising certain pro-social behavior neuroscientists with military grants are claiming they can also use this technology to influence or control a person’s thoughts or feelings about something like, say, God. Or making them feel better about a manufactured immigrant crisis. Or vaccines. Or baseball. Or whatever.

And some people still think MKUltra stopped in the 70s.

Surely this technology would come in handy to, I dunno, give the economy that urgently needed boost or influence political beliefs or pacify the masses. Why not.

Well, for one thing, these particular examples require a machine being placed against the skull.

The real question is, do they have technology that allows them to do this without physically placing a machine directly against your head?

You just watched a video in which brain stimulation was used to turn off a man’s ability to speak at will like flipping off a light switch.

A few years ago, all of a sudden there was a rash of journalists having a similar problem. They would be right in the middle of a broadcast, when suddenly, they were rendered unable to speak. All the words coming out of their mouths degraded within seconds into complete gibberish.

Watch this compilation, uploaded 2012.

Later we were told all of these people were reportedly suffering from a complex migraine, the symptoms of which mimic a stroke.

While that may be true, how long have there been TV reporters on air? Since 1952? And how many times, in all those decades, have you witnessed this strange speech impediment in not just one reporter, but five? All of a sudden, there’s a breakout of this occurring multiple times live on air in the same short timespan?

Back in 2010, the same year Mosley was having parts of his brain shut off for a BBC special, the Department of Defense released a news bulletin entitled, “Remote Control of Brain Activity Using Ultrasound,” detailing new research by Dr. William J. Tyler, assistant professor in the School of Life Sciences at Arizona State University, which was funded by a Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) grant.

The concept is very similar to TMS, only its done remotely.

Here are a few excerpts:

Deep-brain stimulating (DBS) electrodes used to treat movement disorders such as Parkinson’s disease require neurosurgery in order to implant electrodes and batteries into patients. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) used to treat drug-resistant depression and other disorders do not require surgery, but have a low spatial resolution of approximately one centimeter and cannot stimulate deep brain circuits where many diseased circuits reside.

To overcome the above limitations, my laboratory has engineered a novel technology which implements transcranial pulsed ultrasound to remotely and directly stimulate brain circuits without requiring surgery. Further, we have shown this ultrasonic neuromodulation approach confers a spatial resolution approximately five times greater than TMS and can exert its effects upon subcortical brain circuits deep within the brain.

In 2010, they admitted this could be done remotely.

The next step would reportedly use transducer phased arrays to influence brain circuitry and brainwave activity patterns, in addition to capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers (CMUTs) to stimulate the brain.

Technology is almost always presented to the public in the most benevolent light possible. We’re always reassured it is being created under the guise of, say, helping people who have Parkinson’s Disease or for soldiers who suffered traumatic brain injuries on the battlefield, but let’s just cut the c*** and be honest with ourselves.

These examples are not the only people these technologies can be used on, and just look at who is funding the majority of it: the military-industrial complex.

Now they’re playing around with altering people’s beliefs and emotions about things like religion and politics.

This is, by far, not the only technology that can alter a person’s brain waves/function. This examples are drops in the barrel.

Consider the socially engineered, ever politically correct world we find ourselves in today. We are standing on the technofeudalistic precipice where big data will meet Minority Report-style pre-crime. Thought crimes are already being punished. While all technology is of itself inherently neutral, it is who develops and wields that technology and what their true motivations are that should be fully considered here.

Are we set to live in John Carpenter’s 1988 cult classic They Live? In many ways it feels like we’re already there. The question is not can they do it, it’s would they.

Our government has an extensive, well-documented history of researching mind and behavior control for both individuals and the masses. Back in December 1965, as the top secret CIA mind control initiative MKUltra was underway, The New York Times ran an article “Mind Control on Way, Scientist Warns” detailing a chilling takeaway from an annual American Academy of Sciences meeting held in Berkeley, California.

Let’s just leave it here with one more quote.

“This grand new enterprise, this brave new science of the mind, has already made some major advances, and is on the verge of even more significant achievements,” said Dr. Krech [professor of psychology at University of California]. “Perhaps even in some of today’s papers are the beginnings of genuine breakthroughs into the understanding of the mind. If not today, then tomorrow — or the day thereafter, or the year thereafter. I need not spell out for you what such understanding of the mind may mean in terms of the control of the mind.”

“I don’t believe that I am being melodramatic,” Dr. Krech said, “In suggesting that what our research may discover may carry with it even more serious implications than the awful, in both senses of the word, achievements of the atomic physicists. Let us not find ourselves in their position of being caught foolishly surprised, naively perplexed, and touching full of publicly displayed guilt at what they had wrought.”

About The Conscious Reporter


  1. Scary stuff. Probably easy to manufacture a group riot, by agitating a group of people with that sort of technology. As mentioned, technology in itself is a neutral tool, and depending on how used determines the ethics or morality.
    It has been surmised that technology is only given when mankind’s consciousness is able to use it in non destructive ways. It seems so often technology is hijacked by and for evil, stolen and banished from good.
    Whilst reading this I thought why bother with electromagnetic control, when you can poison the water and food? But then watching these videos its going to be a lot easier to sit in your car, or control a satellite to make some talk gibberish exactly when you want them to, rather than waste time and energy trying to convince them to take a pill or poison there drink and wait, and have unpredictable results. Obviously the water and food is en-masse, whilst ‘electrocution’ can be very targeted.
    Such blatant infringement of human free will is psychopathic. Seems to slot in perfectly with the mindset of tyranny to treat other humans as cattle or worse, but then I’m sure there are some very good arguments that’s it’s for our own good and protection and will only be used on evil people who deserve it ?

    • I suppose for those involved in these heinous crimes against humanity and spirituality, it would be necessary for them to create an illusionary veil of justice and righteousness in order to protect THEM from actually having to face the vileness of their own monstrosity.

  2. What a pity!

    They use the advanced technology in order to suppress actually the free will and consciousness and the connection with the divine.

    So they work in order to control the free human power because actually they don’t feel conveniently with the free people. They afraid them, because probably free people are able to uncover their hidden dark agenda. They want enslave people and being humanity under of their commands and spoiled with their nonsense ideas that are in contradiction with the reality and truth.

  3. This is really disturbing. A person’s freedom of thoughts and feelings is the most sacred right, no one has a right to take that away, no matter what the cause. I remember watching that video about the reporters talking gibberish and being appalled at the idea of this terrible technology being used on the poor reporters by sinister people with an agenda.

    I believe as mentioned in the article, they’ll publicize this technology as something good, such as curing depression, mental illness etc, than move onto using it for an extremely unethical, immoral use of it by interrogating “terrorists”, later on gradually moving onto the mass public. Some technologies should simply not be invented at all. I’d hate to imagine the people who have been victimized by this technology already, those of whom the media never reports.

    I agree, that the technology they have is probably far more advanced at the moment from what they are leaking into mainstream media. You hear secret projects dating back from the 60s, who knows how far they’ve come now in advancing their evil technologies.

  4. This is crazy technology and people need to know.

    Keep up the good work Conscious Reporter and thanks for a great article to keep us informed.

  5. “The question is not can they do it, it’s would they.”

    I use to believe that I could trust people and things like this are done in the interests of all, but as more info comes to light and I get older I am becoming ever more skeptical, I think there would be a line up of sinister people who could and would use this technology. This is really scary stuff thanks for the article

  6. That’s quite unsettling. If this is openly discussed and mentioned in the mainstream news then I can’t imagine how much it has been developed. It seems as if it is ready to be used and people are being prepared to accept it as something beneficial and even necessary.

    I would expect some kind of a “healing miracle” or a “scientific breakthrough” performed with this or another similar technique in order to make it look acceptable and very important for society.

    • Good point Christos – I’ve heard people say military technology is about 10 years more advanced than was is released publicly, so who knows what kind of technology they already have access too..

      • Good point David.

        I personally think that vaccinations and the food and water supply is being used in a big way to harm humanity.

        • John, this is my area of interest too. I think it’s just a clever way of getting into our psyche, harming us, basically drugging us. We all have to eat, we all want our kids and loved ones to be healthy. From delving into this area and seeing the way that lies are so easily fed as truth, and how you end up with people actually calling out for more of this lie, and then actually fighting to protect it – I believe the same principles apply across the board.

          This article reveals something very disturbing and the video makes it even more horrific – the look on those people’s faces.

          I wonder if there’s a way you can be protected from this. Can someone who’s totally transformed their basic human energies into something more strong and spiritual withstand technology like this?

          The only problem I had with the article was using the immigration thing as an example. In the UK, where I believe the authour is taking the Daily Express from, this paper is really notorious for fear-mongering of the least subtle kind, and a lot to do with the immigration. I can see that the softy-lefty side is just as brainwashed – let them all in and we’ll all be friends – but I can just imagine the Daily Express using this as another way of pushing fear. I’m sure there would have been many more examples of what this technology can do to manipulate thought and political bias, but it doesn’t seem like we’re being pushed to accept immigrants, rather to have a lot of fear and hostility to them. Maybe both will be employed, at the desired time, such is the amount of influence I am sure ‘they’ have.

          • Hi Ella, I’m very happy to read that your looking at protecting yourself and family from this terrible crime against humanity. I started looking at vaccinations and the food and water supplies many years ago and sadly those in control are able get away with it. Hopefully by passing on the truth to others it will help them realise what go on.

            have found that thankfully if we choose to work on ourselves spiritually we are able to wake up to their wrong doing and we can take the necessary steps forward.

            Best wishers

      • … and it brings few questions: “Why is this technology still hidden?”, “Where is this technology going?” Is it all about one world government, army, religion, economic, etc. Is this going to lead to absolute slavery? Where we will get the chance to only chose between many TV channels. There is also question: “How they are going to reach it?” Is there going to be a World War III.? It also brings me the question: “Why didn’t they use this technology already?”, “What are they waiting for?”. It reminds me when Hitler was developing Germany before World War II. and it was based on employing people in arms industry, truly spending lots of money to create the army that will rull the world for thousand years. Isn’t that similar, when some powerful countries are spending so much money to develop their arms industry, their weapons and secret weapons?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Share This