The Cosmic Consequences of Space Weapons: Why they Must be Banned to Preserve our Future

Clearly the weaponisation of space will enrich the megacorporations producing the goods, and further empower the military-industrial complex, but at what physical and spiritual cost to all of us living on planet Earth? Are we willing to pay the ultimate price for sending super destructive capabilities out of the confines of our planet, and sitting back quietly as this vital planetary issue is decided for us by a tiny minority?

Pages: | ← Previous | |

About Dara

Dara Hayes has a long-held interest in esoteric spirituality and ETs, and a strong wish for alternative spiritual subjects to remain visible and freely accessible to people all over the world. She writes and creates graphics for The Conscious Reporter, and occasionally posts spiritually-themed graphics on


  1. To bring real awareness to the people of our planet, I decided to try and pass on Dara’s article, hopefully it can be shared on a big scale.
    This is all new to me but as a start, I’ve written to Greenpeace, All Things environmental, Peace and Avaaz. Avaaz is a 44-million-person global campaign network.

    Maybe some of us could start a world campaign/petitions through groups such as,

    Hopefully we can find a way to assist so that the 9 nations sign this very important treating.

  2. This reminds me so much of the stories from the book of the Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, in which one planet saw its leaders move into orbit as they were being influenced by a rather disgruntled space mind ;-). The space mind, in its wrath, instructed it (the planet, and its leaders) to build space weapons intent on destroying the universe, or something. I don’t remember. They created a bunch of cricket-looking robots that went about gathering some essentials to perform the destruction.

    Meanwhile the population on the ground had no idea as to what its leaders were actually up to and were actually pretty nice people.

    The space mind “Hactar” had prompted the leaders to move into orbit precisely *because* it would be easier to influence them that way ;-). Anyway, you can read all about it if you search for “Krikket” and HHGTTG. That book is full of interesting stories that could prove to be “true”.

  3. I hope 9 nations will sign this very important treaty ASAP! Thanks Dara for explaining all the ramifications of weapons in space. Amazing that Dr Edgar Mitchell gave a link to this article in an email to John Podesta, obviously he thought it was a great article too.

    • Agree David, I also really hope that 9 nations sign this very important treaty ASAP. Dara’s article brings real awareness forward on these grave issues, there’s a very real need of serious attention from those in control of such serious weapons on our planet.

      Once again, a big thank you to Dara and the team for your great work.

  4. I came across this news flash on the next news network stating that the US must prepare itself for possible space attacks by China and Russia. It looks like the space based weapon agenda is being pushed forward. It’s no surprise to see the US turning the situation around by playing the victim and thereby they must defend themselves against foreign attacks. Instead Russia and China propose a treaty to stop the weaponization of space. I doubt if that option is ever considered before thinking, yeah, lets build weapons to defend ourselves as there is no other way.

  5. For anyone interested in understanding more about the dynamics of the weaponisation of space, the documentary “Pax Americana” does a good job breaking the issue down.

  6. Large tungsten rods, simply dropped from satellites, are totally devastating by the time they reach ground. Even nuclear-hardened bunkers cannot withstand their force. No explosives or lasers needed. Gravity provides all the energy.

  7. Thanks for shining a light on this issue Dara. If China and Russia want to ban space weapons, it’s a pretty clear indication there is an arms race already, otherwise those countries wouldn’t bother trying. History shows that if one country gets a military technological edge other countries will try to close the gap, and an expensive arms race ensues. An the more these capabilities build up, the more we are all threatened. This is what happened with nuclear weapons, and only an outright ban can stop the same thing happening with space weapons.

    A ban would actually increase national security and redirect funds needed elsewhere for all countries — so the argument it would undermine a country’s national security does not really add up. So it seems there must be an agenda to allow space-capable weapons development to proceed.

    I hope enough countries can get behind the treaty that only nine countries need to sign for ratification.

  8. Just came across a great quote that I feel relates well to this article:

    If we continue to develop our technology without wisdom or prudence, our servant may prove to be our executioner – Omar N. Bradley

    Seems like a pretty smart guy!

    • Ike also warned against the military-industrial complex. The generals know what is going on, just as the Pentagon has warned about global warming. It is the politicians who are retarded – what is scary is they tell the generals what to do.

  9. I can imagine people who read this article can brush this armed space race off as sci-fi. I myself sometimes feel it is unreal when I talk to people about this, but from the links you provide anyone can see this is slowly and surely happening. Even a little research on the internet and youtube will bring a large amount of information regarding this topic.

    You clearly lay out the fact that several efforts are being made to prevent the weaponisation of space and the US not wanting to commit to it and a selected group seems indeed interested in the development of these systems. If you watch the below video you’ll see direct footage shot on board of NASA’s Space Shuttle mission STS-48. Apparently a beam of light is fired at what looks like a UFO. This footage was shot in the 90’s which makes you wonder what is currently is possible to attack ET crafts.

    It will be very grave to see a selected elite few choose the future for humanity and isolate us from possible and peaceful contact with beings from outer space who can help us.

  10. NO ONE IS TRYING TO PUT NUKES IN SPACE, this has nothing to do with militarizing space, they are just p***** that the US might have better missile defense ability. You can hardly even call anti-missile Satellites weapons the only thing they harm is missiles

  11. Thanks for speaking out about this Dara. Hearing this type of thing makes me really sad. As though we didn’t harm the planet and ourselves enough already, we are now proceeding to expand our messed up way of life into outer space… Considering all the various issues you’ve brought up, it’s a wonder we haven’t annihilated ourselves already! The psychotronic weapons are a complete disaster as well. At what point do we hand over control over our minds for the sake of potential greater security against a non-existent enemy (to be controlled by the true enemies themselves)? What would a humanity like that look like? What comes to mind is brain dead bots, sitting safely, plugged into a computer, and managed at will “for our own good” and “for greater safety” — sounds a bit Matrix-like, or something straight out of Brave New World.

    • Yes, once I started looking into this I was really shocked that we hadn’t already blown ourselves up, considering the precarious situation created by all of these weapons.

      The psychotronic weapons are quite evil, and of course their development has been largely secret and hidden away from public scrutiny, because of the moral/ ethical/ spiritual implications. Taking control of another human being’s mind and influencing their behaviour against their will is just about as sinister as it gets. I think if the general public became aware of their existence and planned use there would be quite a backlash, even if those developing the weapons claimed it was for greater security or some other excuse.

  12. Thanks Dara, this is very serious and I hope to see a stop to this mess.

  13. Thanks Dara for this very grest and important article. It seems to me as well that the US is really wanting another type of cold-war happening where fear of a “possible” attack made controlling the public easy enough.

    Nationalism was also extremely strong and witch-hunt very easily implemented against people who dared to think different than the majority.

    This weaponization of space is very concerning and something must be done to make this treaty into law. Only 9 signatories – it can be done!

  14. richard spencer

    This is would be laughable if it was not true, is there any place within the universe that we can not contaminate, not only have we brought about our destructive behaviour here we want to continue it in space shame
    Like Dave said 9 countries to sign does not sound like to hard a task yet we cannot even achieve that, scary

  15. Thanks for the article Dara. I am suspicious of the reason why the US does not want to ban weapons – they don’t have a particularly good human rights record with the weapons they currently do have, what would they do with weapons in space that could target anything or anyone?

    The psychotronic weapons that you mentioned are pretty concerning too, along with the possibility of an accidental attack. As technology advances I’m sure we’ll see more artificial intelligence too – I wonder whether we are setting ourselves up for a Terminator type scenario.

    Pretty amazing though that it could all be stopped if nine world leaders were willing to sign the ISCOS treaty, that seems very achievable!

  16. Thanks Dara. Interesting stuff.
    I think the psychopaths are killing people using economics first, then war enmasse, then blow up everyone with nuclear or whatever if they are losing. They would rather kill themselves, the planet and everything than lose control and lose the game (as they see it). It’s a bit like a child that can’t stand losing so tosses the game board in a fit.
    I’m quite sure there would already have been many nuclear ‘accidents’ if it were not for the intervention of ETs. If we look at the US purposely igniting the oil fields in Iraq, it is a small step to dropping a bomb and blaming it on someone else.
    Whilst my first sentence may seem harsh criticism, I think it important to remember that often people creating ‘evil’ plans have a belief and ideology that justifies the plan. To them it is not psychopathic or even necessarily bad, they may well believe it ‘good’. For example many intellectuals firmly believe eugenics is simply ‘nature’ and natural. In the same way humans breed cattle, so too should the elites breed the ‘best’ people and kill off the defectives etc. Evidently there comes a point were consciousness in its positive aspect is amiss, completely suffocated by evil belief, logic, intent and action. Rather than use consciousness and human intelligence to raise the level of being of mankind generally, and tap into ways of healing, love and support (eg. Mesmer), evil chooses self-preservation like all abysmal egos. Instead of aiming to prevent and or heal ‘defectives’ evil would rather slaughter them or ignore them so they die off and aren’t an inconvenience. This approach is totally devoid of ‘human-ness’ and simply animal, or worse than animal. Ironically blowing people up with nuclear weapons creates a huge amount of genetic ‘defectives’. So I wonder sometimes what rationale evil employs, if any. Is evil ideology simply transient, changing with the times and culture, but underneath there is simply raw horrendous maleficence. At what point is your type of person or belief also considered ‘defective’ and due for elimination?

    • Your comment reminded me of what happened in Greece recently Shane. When everything started falling apart and the ‘undesirables’ started being rounded up and put into camps. Maybe disasters are an opportunity to crack down on minorities?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Share This